Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences
: 2017  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 199--202

Complete resolution of papilledema in syndromic craniosynostosis with posterior cranial vault distraction

Melissa LoPresti1, Edward P Buchanan2, Veeral Shah3, Caroline M Hadley1, Laura A Monson2, Sandi Lam1,  
1 Department of Neurosurgery/Pediatric Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
2 Department of Plastic Surgery/Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
3 Department of Ophthalmology/Pediatric Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA

Correspondence Address:
Sandi Lam
Department of Neurosurgery/Pediatric Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., CCC 1230.01, Houston, TX 77030


We report a case of surgical management of Crouzon syndrome with multisuture craniosynostosis presenting with increased intracranial pressure (ICP) manifesting with chronic papilledema without ventriculomegaly. A 12-month-old boy had complete resolution of papilledema after posterior cranial vault distraction followed by staged fronto-orbital advancement. Expansion of the cranial vault with posterior distraction osteogenesis posed an elegant treatment, obviating ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. Strategies for the management of elevated ICP without ventriculomegaly in craniosynostosis include CSF shunting and cranial vault expansion. Posterior calvarial vault distraction associated with resolved papilledema has not been previously reported. Addressing the craniocephalic disproportion for this child with chronic papilledema, without ventriculomegaly, allowed the possibility of shunt freedom.

How to cite this article:
LoPresti M, Buchanan EP, Shah V, Hadley CM, Monson LA, Lam S. Complete resolution of papilledema in syndromic craniosynostosis with posterior cranial vault distraction.J Pediatr Neurosci 2017;12:199-202

How to cite this URL:
LoPresti M, Buchanan EP, Shah V, Hadley CM, Monson LA, Lam S. Complete resolution of papilledema in syndromic craniosynostosis with posterior cranial vault distraction. J Pediatr Neurosci [serial online] 2017 [cited 2022 Jan 26 ];12:199-202
Available from:

Full Text


Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, affects approximately 1 in every 2000–2500 live births.[1] The relationship between increased craniosynostosis and intracranial pressure (ICP) has been well described.[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] Intracranial hypertension (IH) is especially correlated with syndromic cases occurring in about 30%–50% of these patients.[6],[8] The risk is lower in nonsyndromic patients, with 8%–20% experiencing increased ICP.[2],[6],[9] Detecting and treating elevated ICP in these patients is important due to the potential risk that prolonged elevated ICP poses for long-term cognitive deficits, neurologic damage, and vision loss.[6]

The problem of managing elevated ICP in pediatric patients is not straightforward. There is no universally agreed upon normal range of ICP values in children.[8] Furthermore, variable intracranial compliance in young patients complicates measurements.[5],[8] Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting may be difficult to optimize in some cases, with shunt dependence adding complexity to long-term craniosynostosis management.[10] The physical presence of CSF shunt tubing may complicate plans for future staged craniofacial surgeries for cranial vault and facial bone reconstruction and expose patients to additional risks.

 Case Report

Our patient was born at 39 weeks through cesarean section. At birth, he was noted to have a syndromic appearance and was diagnosed with Crouzon syndrome. His 1st month was marked by recurrent ear infections and upper airway problems. At 5 months, he was found to have bilateral papilledema, which went untreated. Computed tomography (CT) of the head had shown no craniosynostosis. He had no medical interventions until 7 months later when he came to our center. At the time, physical examination was concerning for a bulging anterior fontanelle and bilateral papilledema [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b, representing elevated ICP. He met developmental milestones. CT scan at 12 months showed left coronal, left lambdoid, and partial right lambdoid craniosynostosis [Figure 2] without ventriculomegaly. Multidisciplinary input for his complex case was coordinated quickly. Patient was recommended for surgical intervention.{Figure 1}{Figure 2}

At our institution, staged surgery is typically recommended for syndromic craniosynostosis, first with calvarial vault expansion with posterior vault distraction, followed by fronto-orbital advancement after 3 months. Consideration was given to direct CSF diversion in the form of ventriculoperitoneal shunting to reduce ICP. Given his intact visual function and chronic 7-month history of papilledema, other alternatives were considered, including cranial vault expansion. The decision was made to pursue the latter, with close follow-up, for the advantages of shunt freedom.

The patient underwent a preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) venogram of the brain to rule out intracranial-extracranial collateral vessels that may be in the surgical field of the planned posterior approach. There were no collaterals and no venous sinus thrombosis. MR imaging brain also showed findings consistent with the physical examination finding of papilledema, with optic nerve sheath enlargement, protrusion of optic papillae, and posterior globe flattening [Figure 2]. He underwent surgery, with airway evaluation through laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy at intubation, as per protocol with syndromic craniofacial patients; these were normal. A craniotomy was performed, releasing the posterior vault bone flap, and posterior distractor hardware was placed. Patient had initiation of distraction on postoperative day 1 and subsequent serial distraction to a bony gap of 2 cm [Figure 3].{Figure 3}

After surgery, his papilledema improved and resolved over time in 3 months, before his next surgery. He remained developmentally normal, and his postoperative course was uncomplicated. As planned, the patient had staged surgery, with the removal of posterior distraction hardware and fronto-orbital advancement 3 months later [Figure 3]. After his second surgery, the patient remained developmentally normal, with continued complete resolution of papilledema [Figure 1]c and [Figure 1]d. At 6-months' follow-up, he remained developmentally normal with no signs of increased ICP.


Multiple factors contribute to the pathophysiology of elevated ICP in syndromic craniosynostosis. One cause is craniocerebral disproportion due to prematurely fused sutures. While the number of fused sutures shows a correlation to increase in ICP, the relationship between reduced intracranial volume and increased ICP is not linear.[3] Other mechanisms responsible for elevated ICP include venous congestion, hydrocephalus, and upper airway obstruction. Venous anomalies are frequently noted in syndromic craniosynostosis. These irregularities are thought to result in venous hypertension, which raises the pressure gradient for CSF absorption.[7] Irregular dilatations of the subarachnoid spaces are commonly seen in single-suture craniosynostosis.[9] How this may impact CSF flow is unclear. Some have proposed that changes in the bone along the suture line may alter the absorptive abilities of the arachnoid granulations.[4] Others have proposed that excessively high brain pulsation alteration of CSF absorption may be responsible.[11] In addition, upper airway obstruction has been shown to correlate with hypercapnia and increased ICP.[12],[13]

Ventriculoperitoneal shunts have long been considered the gold standard in addressing active hydrocephalus in this subset of children. One study estimated that 12% of children required ventriculoperitoneal shunts after surgical cranial vault expansion for the management of hydrocephalus, with or without papilledema.[12] While this case did not have hydrocephalus or ventriculomegaly, the patient did have elevated ICP, and the mainstay of neurosurgical treatment for elevated ICP with papilledema, with or without ventriculomegaly, is CSF diversion. However, concerns related to the use of shunts exist. Apart from common shunt-related morbidities, there are other concerns in children with complex craniosynostosis. Venous hypertension is difficult to directly address, leading to the possibility of persistent IH, even in the presence of a shunt. In addition, drained CSF spaces will soon fill with growing brain; however, the reconstructed skull may be without a primary growing stimulus if there is overdrainage of CSF. This phenomenon has been posited to favor the tendency of the cranial vault sutures to close prematurely.[14],[15] Finally, the presence of shunt hardware may be in the surgical field in staged craniofacial procedures, exposing the hardware to the risk of infection and dislodgment.

Strategies for management of hydrocephalus or elevated ICP in craniosynostosis include CSF shunt, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, and cranial vault expansion.[16],[17] To our knowledge, posterior calvarial vault distraction associated with resolved papilledema has not been reported. Addressing the craniocephalic disproportion for a child with chronic papilledema allowed for the possibility of shunt freedom in this case. Given signs of elevated ICP secondary to syndromic craniosynostosis without ventriculomegaly, our patient was planned for staged surgery without initial shunting. The first stage included posterior cranial vault distraction to enlarge intracranial volume and help with soft tissue expansion while laying down new cranial bone. The second stage, after bone consolidation, included removal of posterior hardware and frontal orbital advancement. This treatment plan made it possible to address the craniocephalic disproportion contributing to increased ICP and avoid ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. This is desirable, given the high rate of shunt complications, including infections, malfunctions, and the need for subsequent revisions and shunt surgeries. As the papilledema resolved before planned frontal orbital advancement, it was fortuitous that we had not committed to placing VP shunt hardware for CSF diversion, as there would be a real risk of exposing the shunt components during the second staged procedure, further exposing the shunt circuit to risks of infection and malfunction.

A gold standard treatment for children with syndromic craniosynostosis has not yet been established. There is ongoing debate due to the multifaceted etiology of CSF dynamic disorders. The role of posterior fossa distraction, as seen in our patient, was aimed to address the main postulated causes of increased ICP by expanding intracranial volume and correcting craniocephalic disproportion; any venous outflow congestion would likely remain. Close neurologic follow-up and ophthalmologic evaluation were crucial.


In this 12-month-old patient with Crouzon syndrome and multisutural synostosis, expansion of the cranial vault with posterior distraction osteogenesis posed an elegant treatment for high ICP and papilledema, obviating ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. This novel case suggests a possible algorithm for the management of multisuture synostosis and provides options for CSF shunt freedom in selected cases.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1Di Rocco F, Arnaud E, Renier D. Evolution in the frequency of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009;4:21-5.
2Eide PK, Helseth E, Due-Tønnessen B, Lundar T. Assessment of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in childhood craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 2002;37:310-20.
3Gault DT, Renier D, Marchac D, Jones BM. Intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:377-81.
4Hassler W, Zentner J. Radical osteoclastic craniectomy in sagittal synostosis. Neurosurgery 1990;27:539-43.
5Jensen RL, Hahn YS, Ciro E. Risk factors of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with fiberoptic devices: A critical review. Surg Neurol 1997;47:16-22.
6Renier D, Sainte-Rose C, Marchac D, Hirsch JF. Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis. J Neurosurg 1982;57:370-7.
7Taylor WJ, Hayward RD, Lasjaunias P, Britto JA, Thompson DN, Jones BM, et al. Enigma of raised intracranial pressure in patients with complex craniosynostosis: The role of abnormal intracranial venous drainage. J Neurosurg 2001;94:377-85.
8Thompson DN, Harkness W, Jones B, Gonsalez S, Andar U, Hayward R. Subdural intracranial pressure monitoring in craniosynostosis: Its role in surgical management. Childs Nerv Syst 1995;11:269-75.
9Thompson DN, Malcolm GP, Jones BM, Harkness WJ, Hayward RD. Intracranial pressure in single-suture craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 1995;22:235-40.
10Thompson DN, Harkness W, Jones BM, Hayward RD. Aetiology of herniation of the hindbrain in craniosynostosis. An investigation incorporating intracranial pressure monitoring and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997;26:288-95.
11Chadduck WM, Chadduck JB, Boop FA. The subarachnoid spaces in craniosynostosis. Neurosurgery 1992;30:867-71.
12Bannink N, Joosten KF, van Veelen ML, Bartels MC, Tasker RC, van Adrichem LN, et al. Papilledema in patients with Apert, Crouzon, and Pfeiffer syndrome: Prevalence, efficacy of treatment, and risk factors. J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:121-7.
13Tamburrini G, Caldarelli M, Massimi L, Gasparini G, Pelo S, Di Rocco C. Complex craniosynostoses: A review of the prominent clinical features and the related management strategies. Childs Nerv Syst 2012;28:1511-23.
14Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Kollar EM, Zerah M, Brunelle F, Chumas P, et al. Hydrocephalus and craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1998;88:209-14.
15Collmann H, Sörensen N, Krauss J. Hydrocephalus in craniosynostosis: A review. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21:902-12.
16Baird LC, Gonda D, Cohen SR, Evers LH, LeFloch N, Levy ML, et al. Craniofacial reconstruction as a treatment for elevated intracranial pressure. Childs Nerv Syst 2012;28:411-8.
17Kahle KT, Kulkarni AV, Limbrick DD Jr., Warf BC. Hydrocephalus in children. Lancet 2016;387:788-99.