|
 |
|
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
|
|
| Year : 2016 | Volume
: 11
| Issue : 3 | Page : 213-218 |
| |
Epidemiology of the neural tube defects in Kashmir Valley
Masood Ahmed Laharwal1, Arif Hussain Sarmast1, Altaf Umer Ramzan1, Abrar Ahad Wani1, Nayil Khursheed Malik1, Sajad Hussain Arif1, Masooma Rizvi2
1 Department of Neurosurgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lalded Womens Obstetrical/Gynaecological Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
| Date of Web Publication | 3-Nov-2016 |
Correspondence Address:
Arif Hussain Sarmast
Dalipora, Kawadara, Srinagar - 190 002, Kashmir
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.193368
 Abstract | | |
Introduction/Background: Neural tube defects (NTD) are the most common congenital malformations affecting the brain and spinal cord and have a multifactorial etiology. Genetic and environmental factors have been found to cause these defects, both individually and in combination. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, types, demographics, risk factors, and other associated anomalies relevant to NTDs in Kashmir Valley. Materials and Methods: A 2-year hospital-based prospective study was carried out from November 2013 to October 2015. A detailed history of the mother was taken along with detailed clinical examination of neonate including measurement of head circumference and checking the status of fontanella, whether - lax/full/bulging/or tense, type of NTD. Investigations that were done included were X-ray skull: Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral, X-ray spine: AP and lateral, ultrasonography abdomen, magnetic resonance imaging: Spine and brain. Results: The total number of babies with NTD's was 125 with an overall incidence of 0.503. District Kupwara was having the highest incidence (1.047) and district Srinagar the lowest incidence of NTD's (0.197). The majority of NTD's (116 cases, 92.8%) were found in the rural areas. Among the different types of NTD's, spina bifida had an incidence of 0.342 (85 cases, 68%), and anencephaly had an incidence of 0.113 (28 cases, 22.4%). There was a slight preponderance of females over males with NTD's. There were70 females (56%) and 55 males (44%) respectively with a male:female ratio of 0.8:1. Conclusions: The incidence rates of NTDs are very high for Kashmir Valley. Geographical distribution of NTDs at this place confirms a relationship between the socioeconomic status, educational status, maternal age and environmental factors for the development of an NTD. The results of this study point to the importance establishing a health policy to prevent NTDs in Kashmir Valley.
Keywords: Kashmir, meningoceles, myeloceles, myelomeningoceles, neural tube defects
How to cite this article:
Laharwal MA, Sarmast AH, Ramzan AU, Wani AA, Malik NK, Arif SH, Rizvi M. Epidemiology of the neural tube defects in Kashmir Valley. J Pediatr Neurosci 2016;11:213-8 |
| Introduction | |  |
Neural tube defects (NTDs) are the most common congenital malformations affecting the brain and spinal cord. They assume significance by virtue of their morbidity, mortality, health-care expenditure, and human suffering. These defects can be categorized into two groups: Open defects and closed defects. Open defects where the neural tissue is exposed to the air (or amniotic fluid) include spina bifida cystica, which encompasses meningoceles, myeloceles, and myelomeningoceles. Myelomeningocele is a defect in the closure of the neural tube that occurs in the vertebral column. This type of defect can occur anywhere along the spinal column, but is more likely to be placed in the lumbosacral region. Closed defects in which the skin completely covers the neural tissue, include occult spinal dysraphism, which encompasses diastematomyelia, dorsal dermal sinus, and tight filum terminale. Spina bifida occulta refers strictly to bone fusion defects of the lower spine, generally in the lumbosacral region. Anencephaly is a defect in which the head end of the neural tube does not close; this results in the lack of a cranial vault and cerebral hemispheres.[1],[2]
NTD's have a multifactorial etiology.[1],[2],[3] Genetic and environmental factors have been found to cause these defects, both individually and in combination.[2]
| Materials And Methods | | |
This study “Epidemiology of The Neural Tube Defects in Kashmir Valley” – A hospital-based prospective study was conducted in the Neurosurgical Centre of Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Srinagar the only referral center for neurological/neurosurgical problems (hence, all cases of NTDs are referred here) and at the Lal Ded Women's Obstetrical/Gynecological Disease Hospital, Srinagar; the main referral center for obstetrical/gynecological disease, situated in the center of Kashmir Valley. The study was conducted over a period of 2 years from November 2013 to October 2015.
A detailed history of the mother was taken with special impetus on age, occupation: Homemaker/professional worker, dietary history-fruit intake, vegetarian/nonvegetarian diet, smoking/drug addiction – type/duration, exposure to fertilizers, folic acid/vitamin intake, any other drugs, number of times conceived/abortions/intrauterine fetal deaths/previous malformations, mode of delivery, hypertension treatment/drug defaulter, diabetes – duration and type, tuberculosis, CNS disease, epilepsy – type and duration, etc., and examination of the neonate done at Lal Ded Hospital.
Detailed clinical examination of neonate included general physical examination, head circumference, fontanella-lax/full/bulging/tense.
Type of neural tube defect
Anencephaly, encephalocele, myelomeningocele, meningocele, lipomeningocele, spina bifida occulted, etc., site of defect: Cranial/cervical/dorsal/lumbar/sacral. Characteristics of defect: Skin covered or not/leaking or not/transilluminant or not, presence or absence of skin dimple, sinus, hemangioma, hypertrichosis, etc., spine: Normal/scoliosis/kyphosis, other associated malformations, cleft palate, cleft lip, talipes equinovarus hypospadias, etc.
Complete neurological examination of neonate with following, investigations done were X-ray skull: AP and lateral, X-ray spine: AP and lateral, ultrasonography: Abdomen, magnetic resonance imaging: Spine and brain.
To gauge the most accurate epidemiological pattern of NTD's in Kashmir Valley, the patients referred from regions of the state of Jammu and Kashmir other than the valley were excluded from this study.
For statistical analysis, the total number of deliveries in different districts of the Kashmir Valley during the study was obtained from the Department of Population Research, University of Kashmir which was calculated on the basis of prevailing crude birth rate (taken as average of last 3 years) by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Jammu and Kashmir state.
The NTDs were categorized into three main types:
- Anencephaly: A congenital malformation characterized by the total or partial absence of the cranial vault, the covering skin, and the brain missing or reduced to a small mass
- Encephalocele: A congenital malformation characterized by herniation of the brain and/or meninges through a defect in the skull. Encephalocoele is not counted as a separate defect when present with spina bifida
- Spina Bifida: A family of congenital malformation defects in the closure of the spinal column characterized by herniation or exposure of the spinal cord and/or meninges through an incompletely closed spine. This definition includes meningocele, meningomyelocele, myelocele, myelomeningocele, and rachischisis. Spina bifida is not counted as a separate defect when present with anencephalus.
Disease frequency was measured by incidence rates.
Incidence rates of NTD's were calculated by the formula:
Comparisons were made with other studies conducted by various people from time to time with regards to incidence and possible risk factors.
| Observations and Results | | |
Kashmir Valley is topographically and geographically different from rest of the India. It is situated at an altitude of 5000–6000 ft, between 33.5–35° north latitudes and 74–76° east longitude. It has ten districts and a total population of 6,907,623 with a district wise distribution as shown in [Table 1] (as per census of India 2011). In this study, conducted over a period of 2 years from November 2013 to October 2015. The total number of babies with NTD's was 125 with an overall incidence of 0.503. District Kupwara was having the highest incidence (1.047) and district Srinagar the lowest incidence of NTD's (0.197) as shown in [Table 1]. The majority of NTD's (116 cases, 92.8%) were found in the rural areas (incidence 0.572/1000 births) whereas only nine cases, i.e. 7.2% (incidence 0.197/1000 births) were from urban areas. Among the different types of NTD's, spina bifida had an incidence of 0.342 (85 cases, 68%) and anencephaly had an incidence of 0.113 (28 cases, 22.4%). There was a slight preponderance of females over males with NTD's. There were 70 females (56%) and 55 males (44%) respectively with a male:female ratio of 0.8:1. Majority of the patients with anencephaly, i.e., 8 (28.6%) were from district Baramulla and majority of patients with encephalocele 4 (33.3%) and spina bifida 22 (25.8%) were from district Kupwara as shown in [Table 2] and [Table 3]. The highest number of NTD's was seen in children of primigravida (38.4%). Spina bifida and encephalocele were also most commonly seen in children of primigravida. History of a previous abortion was present in 17.6% of the mothers with children having NTD's. About 82.4% of mothers did not give a history of previous abortion as shown in [Table 4]. Mothers of only six babies gave a history of intrauterine fetal death. Of these two had anencephaly and four had spina bifida in present pregnancy. Mothers of three patients had a history of previous malformations. One with encephalocele in present delivery had two previous babies with encephalocele. 1 with meningomyelocele had previous meningomyelocele and one with meningomyelocele had the previous anencephaly. About 22.4% of parents gave a history of consanguinity of marriage. Such history was not present in 77.6% of the parents as depicted in [Table 5]. Ninety-six percent of the mothers with children having NTD's in this study were homemakers. Only 4% were professional workers. Majority of the mothers – 92 cases (73.6%) in this study consumed folic acid after 28 days of conception. None of the mothers used folic acid before conception. The socioeconomic status (SES) of patients was assessed as per modified Prasad's classification. As shown in [Table 6], majority of our patients 93 (74.4%) were from poor and middle class. In this study, majority of the mothers 82 (65.6%) of the NTD affected babies were illiterate. The majority of fathers 84 (67.2%) though literate had an educational level of undergraduate level. | Table 1: District wise population, births per year, distribution, and incidence of neural tube defects in Kashmir Valley
Click here to view |
 | Table 3: District wise distribution of specific types of neural tube defects
Click here to view |
 | Table 4: Distribution of neural tube defects with respect to maternal age groups and parity
Click here to view |
 | Table 5: Distribution of neural tube defects with relation to mothers occupation mothers folic acid intake
Click here to view |
 | Table 6: Distribution of neural tube defects with relation to, previous abortions consanguinity of marriage and socioeconomic status
Click here to view |
Mothers of six neonates in this study were smokers (hookah smoker). None of the mothers was alcoholic. Mother of only one case was having hypertension and was regularly using amlodipine. Mother of one case was having epilepsy and was on sodium valproate which she had used throughout the pregnancy. None of the mothers gave a history of diabetes. Mothers of five neonates were of non-Kashmiri origin (4 Bengalis and 1 Maharashtrian) married to Kashmiri male.
| Discussion | | |
Overall incidence
The incidence of NTDs varies not only from country to country but also from region to region within a country. The incidence of NTDs in this study was 0.503/1000 live births. Nikkilä et al.[4] found the rate of spina bifida among newborns in Sweden to diminish gradually from 0.55/1000 to 0.29/1000 during the study of 31 years. Thunem et al.[5] revealed the annual birth prevalence rate of NTDs in Southern Alberta to be 1.62/1000 total births. Agarwal [6] in their study, found the incidence of NTDs in India to be 0.5–11/1000 live births. Kulkarni et al.[7] have found an extremely high incidence of 11.4/1000 live births in southern India. Sharma et al.[8] in four major maternity hospitals of Lucknow found the overall incidence of NTD to be 3.9/1000 live births. Lemire [9] noted a worldwide incidence of 1.0/1000 live births for NTD's. Our findings are concordant with the previously described incidence of NTD's in some areas of India and Sweden.
Incidence of subgroups
The incidence of various types of NTD's in this study was Anencephaly (0.113/1000 live births), encephalocele (0.048/1000 live births), and spina bifida (0.342/1000 live births). Thunem et al.[5] in their study of NTDs in southern Alberta between 1970 and 1981 found the incidence of spina bifida to vary from 0.17 to 1.50/1000 births (total 0.86), for anencephaly 0.20–0.94/1000 births (total 0.61), and encephalocele 0.00–0.38 (total 0.16). Kulkarni et al.,[10] in their study in Southern India, found the incidence of anencephaly to be 5.10/1000 live births, encephalocele to be 0.85/1000 live births. Mathews [11] reported that the rates in 2005 for 2 of the most common NTD's, spina bifida and anencephaly, were 17.96/100,000 live births and 11.11/100,000 live births, respectively. Myrianthopoulos and Melnick [12] found the total incidence of NTD's in their study to be 1.3/1000 births. The incidence of anencephaly was 0.676/1000 births, incidence of encephalocele was 0.207/1000 births, and that of spina bifida was 0.713/1000 births. The incidence of anencephaly, spina bifida, and encephalocele in the year 1995 in Latin America has been reported as 0.76, 0.93, and 0.15/1000 births respectively and in Mexico as 1.6, 0.89, and 0.31/1000 births, respectively.[13] The incidence of spina bifida in our study goes in concordance with that of Latin America and Mexico, but that of anencephaly and encephalocele are less than in other studies. The reason for incidence of anencephaly to be less in this study could be that anencephaly is not compatible with life and most of the babies with it die immediately after birth. As this study was hospital-based conducted at Department of Neurosurgery, SKIMS and Lal Ded Hospital for obstetrical and gynecological diseases, cases of anencephaly delivered at other places in the valley must not have survived to be referred to us.
Male:female
In this study, there was a slight preponderance of females over males with NTD's in total (male:female ratio of 0.8:1) as well as in subgroups. This is in concordance with the study of Jorde et al.[14] who in their study found a male:female ratio of 0.67. Whiteman et al.[15] in their study of 694 cases of NTD in Oxfordshire, England also found that female offspring were more than twice as likely as males to harbor an NTD.
Maternal age
In this study, we found that most of the NTD's 54 (43.2%) including the subgroups of NTD's, i.e. 14 patients (50%) of anencephaly, 6 patients (50%) of encephalocele, and 34 (40%) patients of spina bifida occurred in mothers of younger age group (20–24 years). A number of studies have reported maternal age risk for NTD's to be U-shaped, i.e., highest among youngest and oldest women, while other studies have found risk to decrease with increasing age or the reverse.[16] In concordance with our study Vieira et al.[17] in a meta-analysis study of maternal age as risk factor for NTD's, found increased risk associated with mothers of 40+ years and mothers younger than 19 years. The detected effect was stronger for SB than for anencephaly. Frey and Hauser [18] also reported increased risk of NTD's in older or very young mothers. Whiteman et al.[15] in their study found most of mothers (46.9%) with NTD affected baby to lie in the age group 20–24 years and only 6.2% in the age group 30 or more than 30 years. Strassburg et al.[19] observed that advanced maternal age was a stronger risk factor for spina bifida than for anencephalus, but no increased risk was observed among teenage mothers.
Parity
In this study, the highest number of NTD's was found in primigravidas 48 cases (38.4%) followed by multigravidas 30 cases (24%). This is in concordance with the study of Little and Elwood [20] who in their study found a U-shaped pattern of NTD risk, i.e., risk being higher for the lowest and highest order of births. Whiteman et al.[15] in concordance with our study also found most of the mothers with NTD affected pregnancy were primigravida (35.2%). Only 17.2% of mothers in their study had three or more previous deliveries. Elwood et al.[21] also reported a modest increase in NTD risk in mothers of parity three or more and an increased risk in primiparous mothers.
Prior abortions
In this study, 82.4% of mothers did not give a history of previous abortion. Whiteman et al.[15] in concordance with our study also found that 77.1% of the mothers with NTD affected babies did not have the previous history of abortions. Little and Elwood [20] and Myrianthopoulos and Melnick,[12] reported higher rates of prior spontaneous abortions in women with NTD-affected pregnancies. David et al.[11] in their study also found a significant excess of spontaneous abortions when the preceding pregnancy was compared with the succeeding pregnancy.
Consanguinity
About 77.6% of the cases of NTD in our study were a product of nonconsanguineous marriage. In concordance with our study Asindi and Al-Shehri [22] in their study in the Asir Region of Saudi Arabia found that consanguinity rates were not high among parents of newborns with NTD than in the general population. In some studies, higher NTD rates have been found where the parents are related Little and Elwood.[20]
Occupation of mother
In this study, 12 (96%) mothers were a homemaker. Although a number of studies have shown an increased risk of NTD's in mothers with an occupation such as cleaning, healthcare,[23] agriculture and janitors,[24] none of the mothers in this study was having such an occupation. Little and Elwood [20] did not find a consistent link with maternal occupation and maternal exposures. Thulstrup and Bonde [25] in their study also found no convincing evidence linking occupational exposure during pregnancy and birth defects including NTD's.
Socioeconomic status
Majority of the cases 93 (74.4%) in this study belonged to low or middle-class families. The SES of the families was assessed by modified Prasad's classification. This finding goes in concordance with other studies where increased incidences of NTD's have been found in families of low SES. Blanco Muñoz et al.[26] in their study in a Mexican population found increased risk of anencephaly in mothers of low SES. Mutchinik et al.[27] found a significantly greater frequency of bricklayers among fathers of anencephalic children than among fathers of healthy children. They attributed this difference to the low socioeconomic level associated with this occupation. Elwood andElwood [28] found an association between living in socially deprived areas and anencephaly. However, Strassburg et al.[19] found no association between SES and the incidence of anencephaly or spina bifida.
Educational status of parents
Majority of the mothers 82 (65.6%) in this study were illiterate and majority of fathers 84 (67.2%) though literate were undergraduates. In concordance with this study Grewal et al.[29] in their study found women who did not graduate from high school and lived in low-SES neighborhoods exhibited a significantly higher risk for NTD pregnancy than women with high school or higher education who lived in the same neighborhood. Farley et al.[30] reported that risk estimates for NTD's ranged between 1.8 and 2.3 for mothers with less than a high school education. However, Rouhani et al.[31] and Velie and Shaw et al.[32] found no association between risk of NTD's and educational level of the mother.
Folic acid intake
Majority of the mothers 92 (73.6%) in this study had taken folic acid after 28 days of conception. Only 12 (9.6%) of the mothers had consumed folic acid within 28 days of conception and none before conception. In patients who have a family history of an NTD, folic acid taken orally on a daily basis is shown to lower the occurrence and recurrence of NTD's in their own offspring and in their relatives. The Medical Research Council (Group MRCVSR 1991)[33] was the first to prove conclusively that when women who had had a previous child affected by an NTD took 4.0 mg of folic acid daily, beginning 3 months before conception, there was a 70% reduction in the recurrence in subsequent offspring. Berry et al.[34] demonstrated a 79% reduction in occurrence in North China (an area of high incidence) but only 40% in South China (where there is a low incidence) when the women took 0.4 mg of folic acid periconceptually. Since none of the mothers in our study had taken folic acid preconceptually and there is no existing program of fortification of food with folic acid in the valley, counselling of such mothers and implementing food fortification with folic acid will further decrease the incidence of NTD's in the valley.
| Conclusions | | |
The incidence rates of NTDs are very high for Kashmir Valley. Geographical distribution of NTDs in this geographical area confirms a relationship between the socioeconomic status, educational status, maternal age and environmental factors for the development of an NTD. The results of this study point to the importance establishing a health policy to prevent NTDs in Kashmir Valley.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.[34]
| References | | |
| 1. | Cabrera RM, Hill DS, Etheredge AJ, Finnell RH. Investigations into the etiology of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2004;72:330-44.  |
| 2. | Detrait ER, George TM, Etchevers HC, Gilbert JR, Vekemans M, Speer MC. Human neural tube defects: Developmental biology, epidemiology, and genetics. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2005;27:515-24. |
| 3. | Kaufman BA. Neural tube defects. Pediatr Clin North Am 2004;51:389-419. |
| 4. | Nikkilä A, Rydhström H, Källén B. The incidence of spina bifida in Sweden 1973-2003: The effect of prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Public Health 2006;16:660-2. |
| 5. | Thunem NY, Lowry RB, Tucker BJ, Medd BW. Birth prevalence and recurrence rates of neural tube defects in Southern Alberta in 1970-81. CMAJ 1988;138:819-23. |
| 6. | Agarwal SS. Neural tube defect: A preventable congenital malformation. Indian Pediatr 1999;36:643-8. |
| 7. | Kulkarni ML, Mathew MA, Ramachandran B. High incidence of neural-tube defects in South India. Lancet 1987;1:1260. |
| 8. | Sharma AK, Upreti M, Kamboj M, Mehra P, Das K, Misra A, et al. Incidence of neural tube defects of Lucknow over a 10 year period from 1982-1991. Indian J Med Res 1994;99:223-6. |
| 9. | Lemire RJ. Neural tube defects. JAMA 1988;259:558-62. |
| 10. | Kulkarni ML, Mathew MA, Reddy V. The range of neural tube defects in southern India. Arch Dis Child 1989;64:201-4. |
| 11. | Mathews TJ. Trends in Spina Bifida and Anencephalus in the United States, 1991-2005. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2007. |
| 12. | Myrianthopoulos NC, Melnick M. Studies in neural tube defects. I. Epidemiologic and etiologic aspects. Am J Med Genet 1987;26:783-96. |
| 13. | Congenital Malformations Worldwide: A Report from the International Clearing House for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems. Italy: International Centre for Birth Defects; 1997. |
| 14. | Jorde LB, Fineman RM, Martin RA. Epidemiology of neural tube defects in Utah, 1940-1979. Am J Epidemiol 1984;119:487-95. |
| 15. | Whiteman D, Murphy M, Hey K, O'Donnell M, Goldacre M. Reproductive factors, subfertility, and risk of neural tube defects: A case-control study based on the Oxford Record Linkage Study Register. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:823-8. |
| 16. | McDonnell RJ, Johnson Z, Delaney V, Dack P. East Ireland 1980-1994: Epidemiology of neural tube defects. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:782-8. |
| 17. | Vieira AR, Castillo Taucher S. Maternal age and neural tube defects: Evidence for a greater effect in spina bifida than in anencephaly. Rev Med Chil 2005;133:62-70. |
| 18. | Frey L, Hauser WA. Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Epilepsia 2003;44 Suppl 3:4-13. |
| 19. | Strassburg MA, Greenland S, Portigal LD, Sever LE. A population-based case-control study of anencephalus and spina bifida in a low-risk area. Dev Med Child Neurol 1983;25:632-41. |
| 20. | Little L, Elwood JM. Epidemiology of neural tube defects. In: Kiley M, editor. Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology. Boston: CRC Press; 1991. p. 251-336. |
| 21. | Elwood JM, Little J, Elwood JH. Epidemiology and Control of Neural Tube Defects. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. |
| 22. | Asindi A, Al-Shehri A. Neural tube defects in the Asir Region of Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2001;21:26-9. |
| 23. | Brender J, Suarez L, Hendricks K, Baetz RA, Larsen R. Parental occupation and neural tube defect-affected pregnancies among Mexican Americans. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44:650-6. |
| 24. | Blatter BM, Roeleveld N, Zielhuis GA, Gabreëls FJ, Verbeek AL. Maternal occupational exposure during pregnancy and the risk of spina bifida. Occup Environ Med 1996;53:80-6. |
| 25. | Thulstrup AM, Bonde JP. Maternal occupational exposure and risk of specific birth defects. Occup Med (Lond) 2006;56:532-43. |
| 26. | Blanco Muñoz J, Lacasaña M, Borja Aburto VH, Torres Sánchez LE, García García AM, López Carrillo L. Socioeconomic factors and the risk of anencephaly in a Mexican population: A case-control study. Public Health Rep 2005;120:39-45. |
| 27. | Mutchinick O, Orozco E, Lisker R, Babinsky V, Núñez C. Risk factors associated with neural tube defects: Exposure during the first trimester of gestation. Gac Med Mex 1990;126:227-33. |
| 28. | Elwood JH, Elwood JM. Investigation of area differences in the prevalence at birth of anencephalus in Belfast. Int J Epidemiol 1984;13:45-52. |
| 29. | Grewal J, Carmichael SL, Song J, Shaw GM. Neural tube defects: An analysis of neighbourhood- and individual-level socio-economic characteristics. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009;23:116-24. |
| 30. | Farley TF, Hambidge SJ, Daley MF. Association of low maternal education with neural tube defects in Colorado, 1989-1998. Public Health 2002;116:89-94. |
| 31. | Rouhani P, Fleming LE, Frías J, Martínez-Frías ML, Bermejo E, Mendioroz J. Pilot study of socioeconomic class, nutrition and birth defects in Spain. Matern Child Health J 2007;11:403-5. |
| 32. | Velie EM, Shaw GM. Impact of prenatal diagnosis and elective termination on prevalence and risk estimates of neural tube defects in California, 1989-1991. Am J Epidemiol 1996;144:473-9. |
| 33. | Prevention of neural tube defects: Results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet 1991;338:131-7. |
| 34. | Berry RJ, Li Z, Erickson JD, Li S, Moore CA, Wang H, et al. Prevention of neural-tube defects with folic acid in China. China-U.S. collaborative project for neural tube defect prevention. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1485-90. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]
|
