<%server.execute "isdev.asp"%> Infratentorial medulloepithelioma with divergent differentiation: Possibly a predictor of poor outcome Chakrabarti I, Majumdar K, Giri A - J Pediatr Neurosci
home : about us : ahead of print : current issue : archives search instructions : subscriptionLogin 
Users online: 1583      Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
  Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 142-145
 

Infratentorial medulloepithelioma with divergent differentiation: Possibly a predictor of poor outcome


1 Department of Pathology, North Bengal Medical College, West Bengal, India
2 Senior Research Associate, Department of Pathology, Academic Block, G B Pant Hospital, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, New Delhi 110002, India

Date of Web Publication17-Oct-2012

Correspondence Address:
Indranil Chakrabarti
Department of Pathology, North Bengal Medical College, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.102581

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Medulloepitheliomas (WHO grade IV) are rare, malignant embryonal tumors of pediatric population, classified under the central nervous system (CNS) primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET). Histologically, these tumors are characterized by neoplastic neuroepithelium recapitulating the embryonic neural tube. We describe a rare case of infratentorial medulloepithelioma with divergent differentiation in a 1-year-old male child who presented with headache, vomiting, and seizures. Histopathologic examination of the excised tumor revealed the characteristic neuroepithelium, along with other areas showing primitive neuroectodermal (blastemal) cells in sheets, ependymoblastic rosettes, and nodular areas of neuronal differentiation. Possibly, this proliferating immature neuroepithelium is the cause of poor outcome in medulloepitheliomas. Due to the rarity of these tumors, it remains to be established whether infratentorial location or tumors with divergent differentiation are also predictors of adverse prognosis.


Keywords: Differentiation, ependymoblastic, infratentorial, medulloepithelioma, neuronal


How to cite this article:
Chakrabarti I, Majumdar K, Giri A. Infratentorial medulloepithelioma with divergent differentiation: Possibly a predictor of poor outcome. J Pediatr Neurosci 2012;7:142-5

How to cite this URL:
Chakrabarti I, Majumdar K, Giri A. Infratentorial medulloepithelioma with divergent differentiation: Possibly a predictor of poor outcome. J Pediatr Neurosci [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Jun 18];7:142-5. Available from: http://www.pediatricneurosciences.com/text.asp?2012/7/2/142/102581



   Introduction Top


First described by Bailey and Cushing in 1926, [1] cerebral medulloepitheliomas are extremely rare and highly aggressive embryonal brain tumors affecting the pediatric population, with only 37 published cases. [2] Histologically, these lesions are composed of papillary, tubular, or trabecular arrangements of neoplastic neuroepithelium reminiscent of the structure of embryonic neural tube. [2],[3] Classified under the group of central nervous system (CNS) primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET), medulloepitheliomas may also show differentiation along neuronal, astrocytic, ependymoblastic, oligodendroglial, or mesenchymal lines. [2] These tumors correspond to World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV and carry a dismal prognosis with a median survival of 5 months. [2] Here, we report a case of 1-year-old child with posterior fossa medulloepithelioma displaying multiple lineages of differentiation.


   Case Report Top


A 1-year-old male child presented to the out-patient department with symptoms of headache, nausea, and vomiting for the last 2½ months. The patient suffered a bout of seizure 4 days back. He had no significant medical or family history. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed an isodense, well-circumscribed tumor mass in the posterior fossa with contrast enhancement. A radiological suggestion of medulloblastoma was made. The patient underwent debulking of the tumor; multiple tissue pieces received were irregular, grayish pink, with tiny foci of cystic change and hemorrhage, and size ranging from 1 cm diameter to 3 × 2.5 × 2 cm. Microscopic examination showed well-defined ribbons and strands of pseudostratified neuroepithelium arranged in papillary and tubular patterns, recapitulating the primitive neural tube [Figure 1]. External limiting membrane as described was seen on the outer surface of the stratified epithelium; few cystically dilated spaces lined by the epithelium and containing homogeneous eosinophilic material were also observed [Figure 2]. Mitotic figures were prominent in the pseudostratified strands of neuroepithelium, particularly near the luminal surface (2-3/high-power field). In other areas of the tumor, sheets of primitive neuroectodermal cells, with hyperchromatic nuclei, scanty cytoplasm, and nuclear molding were seen [Figure 1], along with interspersed ependymoblastic rosettes [[Figure 1], inset, above left]. These are true rosettes having central lumina, surrounded by cells dispersed in multiple concentric layers, with the outermost cellular layer characteristically intermingling with the surrounding undifferentiated small round cells. Extensive areas of neuronal differentiation [Figure 3] and [Figure 4] were also observed. In addition, focal astrocytic [Figure 4] and [Figure 5] and ependymal [Figure 6] differentiation was also noted. A morphological diagnosis of medulloepithelioma with differentiation along neuronal, astrocytic, ependymal, and ependymoblastic lineages was considered. The patient was treated with postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy (with vincristine, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide). Unfortunately, the child had a rapid downhill course and died after 3 months of surgery.
Figure 1: Photomicrograph showing ribbons of primitive neuroepithelium (above left, arrow) mimicking embryonic neural tube; in other areas of the tumor, sheets of undifferentiated neuroectodermal cells (lower right, thin arrow) with interspersed ependymoblastic rosettes (arrow head) (H & E stain, 40× magnification). (Inset, below right) Sheets of undifferentiated neuroectodermal cells at higher magnification (H & E stain, 400× magnification). (Inset, above right) Characteristic multilayered ependymoblastic rosette, with outer cell layer merging with the undifferentiated cells (H & E stain, 400×)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Epithelium-lined cystic space filled with eosinophilic material; tubular strands of hyperchromatic neuroepithelium seen in far right and far left (H & E stain, 100×)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Photomicrograph showing well-demarcated islands of pale staining areas representing neuronal differentiation (arrow heads); neuroepithelium seen in this illustration also (arrows) (H & E stain, 100×)

Click here to view
Figure 4: Ribbon of primitive neuroepithelium (arrow head) in the left, with adjacent focus of astrocytic differentiation; a nodule of neuronal differentiation (arrow) in the right and neuroectodermal (blastemal) cells in sheets at the center (H & E stain, 400×)

Click here to view
Figure 5: Another focus of astrocytic differentiation in a fibrillary background; note the stratified neuroepithelium (arrow head) in the lower left (H & E stain, 400×)

Click here to view
Figure 6: Focus of ependymal differentiation (area under the left of arc) (H & E stain, 400×)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Medulloepitheliomas are extremely rare embryonal tumors which affect children mostly between the ages of 6 months and 5 years with an equal sex distribution. [2] The rarity of this tumor in CNS can be estimated by the fact that around 37 cases have been reported to the best of our literature search. [2],[4] Contrary to medulloblastomas, which are infratentorial tumors, medulloepitheliomas more commonly have supratentorial location. The cerebrum appears to be the most favored site accounting for nearly 30% of all medulloepitheliomas - with the most common site being periventricular, and involving in order of frequency, the temporal, parietal, occipital, and frontal lobes. [4] Cases occurring in the intraorbital region, cauda equina, presacral area, and sciatic nerve have been reported. [2] In one series of eight cases, Molloy et al.[5] found the tumors equally distributed in supratentorial and infratentorial locations. In our case, the tumor was present in the posterior fossa, with a radiological impression of medulloblastoma.

In addition to the primitive neuroepithelium, the tumor displayed sheets of undifferentiated blastemal (neuroectodermal) cells having small round cell morphology. Histogenetically, presence of characteristic neuroepithelium recreating embryonic neural tube led to the concept that these tumors are probably derived from the neoplastic transformation of a periventricular or subependymal precursor cell. [2] The primitive neuroectodermal cells may have undergone maturation arrest at an intermediate stage of differentiation, resulting in the formation and subsequent proliferation of the immature neuroepithelium. Cases showing differentiation toward neuronal, glial, or even mesenchymal tissues have been reported. [2] This explains the multipotent nature of the primitive neuroectodermal cells. The present case morphologically showed focal astrocytic, ependymal, and extensive neuronal differentiation, with well-formed ependymoblastic rosettes. Immunohistochemical confirmation of divergent differentiation, along with assessment of proliferative activity could have been more useful.

The concept of ependymoblastoma has been recently questioned, and the cells in "ependymoblastic rosettes" may not be primarily ependymal or glial precursors. [6],[7] Instead, such multilayered true rosettes with central lumen, described as "ependymoblastic rosettes," have now been shown to occur also in supratentorial CNS PNETs, medulloepitheliomas, and a newly described variant referred to as "Embryonal Tumor with Abundant Neuropil and True Rosettes" (ETANTR). [2],[7] Medulloepitheliomas may also share a histogenetic overlap with teratoma owing to the occasional mesenchymal differentiation. Henceforth, the differential diagnoses include medulloblastoma, choroid plexus carcinoma, and immature teratoma. [2] ETANTR does not usually occur in the posterior fossa. Immature teratomas, in addition to primitive neuroectodermal component, also contain tissue of fetal appearance from other germ layers. [2]

Due to relatively less number of cases encountered, the optimal course of management for these high-grade tumors is yet to be standardized, and they are usually associated with rapid progression and dismal prognosis. Only three reported cases till date have survived beyond 5 years. [4] Gross total resection followed by radiotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy is the most accepted treatment protocol. Our case with infratentorial location and histological evidence of divergent differentiation had undergone surgical debulking followed by chemo-radiotherapy, but unfortunately died after 3 months of surgery. Moftakhar et al., [4] after a thorough review of the reported cases of cerebral medulloepitheliomas, did not find any prognostic implication of age or gender. However, they noted that supratentorial tumors and negative cerebrospinal fluid were associated with better prognosis, while the well-differentiated medulloepitheliomas were associated with recurrence, consistent with that observed in PNETs with differentiation. [4] This higher recurrence rate may be due to resistance to chemotherapy and radiation in tumors with differentiation.

A study involving stratification of medulloblastomas on the basis of histopathologic grading showed no evidence of association between nodularity and anaplasia or outcome. [8] In medulloepitheliomas, it remains to be confirmed through larger case series, whether primitive neuroectodermal cells displaying differentiation along divergent cell lineages have a different outcome and proliferative activity. In addition, like medulloblastomas, grading of this primitive neuroectodermal component (small round cells) on the basis of anaplasia and apoptosis [8] can also be attempted in medulloepitheliomas. Fan et al.[9] observed that there is increased amplification of hTERT gene and increased mRNA expression in CNS embryonal tumors, which may play an important role in the evolution of a molecular prognostic marker in years to come.

 
   References Top

1.Bailey P, Cushing H. A classification of tumors of the glioma group on a histogenetic basis with a correlated study of progress. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1926. p. 54-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.McLendon RE, Judkins AR, Eberhart CG, Fuller GN, Sarkar C, Ng H-K. Central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumours. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, editors. Pathology and Genetics, World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. 4 th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2007. p. 141-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Ellison D, Love S, Chimelli L, Harding BN, Lowe J, Vinters HV. Embyronal neuroepithelial neoplasms of the CNS. In: Ellison D, editor. Neuropathology, a Reference Text of CNS Pathology. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 673-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Moftakhar P, Fan X, Hurvitz CH, Black KL, Danielpour M. Long-term survival in a child with a central nervous system medulloepithelioma. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008;2:339-45.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Molloy PT, Yachnis AT, Rorke LB, Dattilo JJ, Needle MN, Millar WS, et al. Central nervous system medulloepithelioma: A series of eight cases including two arising in the pons. J Neurosurg 1996;84:430-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Judkins AR, Ellison DW. Ependymoblastoma: Dear, damned, distracting diagnosis, farewell! Brain Pathol 2010;20:133-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Eberhart CG. Molecular diagnostics in embryonal brain tumors. Brain Pathol 2011;21:96-104.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Giangaspero F, Wellek S, Masuoka J, Gessi M, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H. Stratification of medulloblastoma on the basis of histopathological grading. Acta Neuropathol 2006;112:5-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Fan X, Wang Y, Kratz J, Brat DJ, Robitaille Y, Moghrabi A, et al. hTERT gene amplification and increased mRNA expression in central nervous system embryonal tumors. Am J Pathol 2003;162:1763-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (3,163 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1739    
    Printed67    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded96    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal