<%server.execute "isdev.asp"%> Evaluation of a parent-based behavioral intervention program for children with autism in a low-resource setting Juneja M, Mukherjee SB, Sharma S, Jain R, Das B, Sabu P - J Pediatr Neurosci
home : about us : ahead of print : current issue : archives search instructions : subscriptionLogin 
Users online: 5      Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
  Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 16-18
 

Evaluation of a parent-based behavioral intervention program for children with autism in a low-resource setting


Department of Pediatrics, Child Development Center, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication28-Jun-2012

Correspondence Address:
Monica Juneja
Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi - 110002
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.97612

Get Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Background: Intensive behavioral intervention programs are recommended for children with autism. However, in resource-constraint settings, such programs are largely inaccessible, and there is an urgent need for development of low-cost interventions. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of a parent-based behavioral intervention program in Indian autistic children. Materials and Methods: Sixteen children with autistic disorder undergoing the intervention for at least six months were enrolled. The mean development, social, expressive, and receptive language quotients, and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) scores were compared before and after the intervention. Results: The average duration of therapy was 19.5±11.78 months. There was a significant improvement in the development quotient (P=0.015), social quotient (P=0.004), expressive language quotient (P=0.03), CARS (P=0.001), and ABC (P=0.014) scores. Conclusion: Parent-based behavioral intervention programs have a promising role in management of children with autism in resource-constraint settings.


Keywords: Autistic disorder, behavioral intervention, parent-based program


How to cite this article:
Juneja M, Mukherjee SB, Sharma S, Jain R, Das B, Sabu P. Evaluation of a parent-based behavioral intervention program for children with autism in a low-resource setting. J Pediatr Neurosci 2012;7:16-8

How to cite this URL:
Juneja M, Mukherjee SB, Sharma S, Jain R, Das B, Sabu P. Evaluation of a parent-based behavioral intervention program for children with autism in a low-resource setting. J Pediatr Neurosci [serial online] 2012 [cited 2014 Oct 23];7:16-8. Available from: http://www.pediatricneurosciences.com/text.asp?2012/7/1/16/97612



   Introduction Top


Behavioral interventions are currently the most successful treatment for autism. [1] In low-resource settings such as India, the center-based intensive behavioral intervention programs are largely inaccessible and unaffordable to parents. As there are an estimated 2.3 million children with autistic spectrum disorder in India, there is an urgent need for development of low-cost interventions. [2] In this preliminary study, we evaluated the efficacy of a parent-based intervention program in autistic children.


   Materials and Methods Top


This was a retrospective review of children with Autistic Disorder (AD) attending the Child Development Center (CDC) of Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi. CDC is a referral center for children with behavioral and developmental disorders. It has a team of Pediatricians, Clinical Psychologists, Speech Therapists, Special Educators, and Occupational Therapists, and provides comprehensive care to children with developmental disabilities.

For this study, children aged 6 years or less, diagnosed with AD as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4 th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria, and undergoing regular interventions at CDC for at least last six months were enrolled. [3] Children with incomplete baseline assessments, any sensory or motor comorbidities, or receiving any other therapy (including special schools or pharmacotherapy) were excluded.

At the time of enrollment in this study, all the included children underwent repeat assessments of the parameters that were assessed at baseline. The mean scores before and after the interventions were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 11. The differences in the mean scores before and after the intervention were compared using the paired t-test. Significance was set at P value of 0.05.

Assessments

The parameters assessed at baseline and at the time of enrollment in the study were as follows:

  1. Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS): This is a 15-item behavior rating scale developed to identify children with autism and grade severity. [4]
  2. Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC): This is a behavior checklist containing 57 items divided into five categories: sensory, body and objects, language, social, and social-help. [5]
  3. Early Developmental Profile (EDP): This is used to assess Developmental Quotient (DQ). It assesses the development in six domains: gross motor, fine motor, cognition, language, social, and Activities of Daily Living (ADL). [6]
  4. Vineland Social Maturity Scale: This 127-item scale assesses Social Quotient (SQ). [7]
  5. Receptive Expressive Emergent Language Scale: This is a 186-item inventory used to assess Expressive and Receptive Language Quotients (ELQ and RLQ). [8]


Intervention protocol

The management protocol followed at CDC for children with AD involves provision of parent-based interventions in a non-structured individualized manner. The program relies on parents as sole therapists for the child, with the specialists only demonstrating to them various activities to be incorporated in their daily living at home. Initially, sessions are carried out every 2 weeks for 2-3 months followed by monthly sessions. Parents are expected to spend 45-90 minutes daily in a one-to-one setting with the child. Other family members such as siblings and grandparents, if available, are also encouraged to be part of the intervention.

An individualized program is designed for each child with the aim of training them in joint attention activities, increasing social interaction, following the basic age-appropriate rules of society in social interaction and play, developing communication and decreasing unwanted behaviors.

Principles of the Naturalistic method/Milieu method are used to create situations during the daily activities of the family, develop joint attention behaviors such as index pointing, gaze switching, showing, and holding out objects. [9] Socialization is encouraged by improving play with siblings and visits to market, neighbors, or relatives. There is a focus on development of social and communicative competence (social smile, greeting and wishing appropriately, cuddling and social orienting, facial looking, waving lifting up of arms to be picked up, etc) and communication for fulfilling daily needs. The use of play-based activities for development of joint attention behaviors, social skills, and communication, e.g. turn taking, requesting etc. is taught. Specific activities include ball play, play using toy-cars, clay, colored stones and balloons, water play, and painting and coloring. Some household utensils, clothes, vegetables, or wrappers (depending on child's interest) are also used for sorting games. Reading of picture book stories/showing pictures is explained to parents who were literate.

The focus for development of communication is on learning of simple gestures and words for communication using principles of Lovaas Applied Behavior Analysis, which are modified to the needs of the family. [10] For children with severe autism who are non-verbal, communication is focused on modification of primitive gestures to useful gestures, signs, and symbols. Pointing along with some verbal vocalization is incorporated in daily activities and in specific activities such as imitating actions and table games (matching of object to object, picture to object, etc). Simple gestures like holding up arms to be picked up and nodding of head for yes/no are also included in the repeated to-fro activities.

The parents are also trained to elicit compliance, 'waiting', and control temper tantrums. The focus is on making the child sit at one place and pay attention. The program also stresses on development of skills for activities of daily living, especially in older children with co-morbid severe Mental Retardation. The parents are given demonstration for development of independent skills such as washing, dressing, and meal time routines.


   Results Top


At the time of the study, 36 children aged ?6 years were on regular follow-up and therapy for last 6 months. Of these, three children had co-morbid cerebral palsy, two had vision impairment, and one had hearing impairment. Four children were on drug Risperidone and, in 10 cases, baseline assessments were incomplete. Therefore, ultimately, the data of the remaining 16 children (13 boys, 3 girls) were analyzed.

The mean age was 39.06±22.05 months. No medical etiology for autism was evident in any child. Six children belonged to the lower socioeconomic strata, while nine belonged to the middle class. Four mothers were illiterate, five had studied up to high school, and seven had college education. Fifteen children had severe autism (CARS scores >45) and one had mild-to-moderate autism (CARS scores 30-45). Co-morbid Global Developmental Delay was present in 13 (81.25%) children.

The average duration of therapy was 19.5±11.78 months. The mean scores of DQ, SQ, ELQ, RLQ, CARS, and ABC before and after the intervention are detailed in [Table 1]. Significant improvement was noted in DQ (P=0.015), SQ (P=0.004), and ELQ (P=0.03). There was a significant reduction in the CARS (P=0.001) and ABC (P=0.014) scores. Within the individual domains of developmental assessment, there was a significant improvement in scores of cognition, language, social emotional, and activities of daily living, as compared to motor function [Table 2].
Table 1: Effect of parent-based intervention on developmental and autism severity scores (n=16)

Click here to view
Table 2: Effect of parent-based intervention on various developmental domains (n=16)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has evaluated a parent-based behavioral intervention program in autistic children in a low-resource setting. Intensive behavioral interventions are the cornerstones of management of autism; however, their cost is prohibitively high. In this study, we demonstrated the efficacy of parent-based behavioral intervention even when parents were illiterate and belonged to low socioeconomic classes.

The patients in our study showed significant improvement in autism severity as assessed by CARS, expressive language, and adaptive functions scores. Our results were similar to the study by Aldred et al. who demonstrated significant improvements in ADOS total scores and expressive language when parents were educated and trained in adapted communication tailored to their child's individual competencies. [11] Drew et al. conducted a randomized control trial of parent training intervention in preschool children and also found significant improvement in expressive language, but no significant improvement in receptive language, similar to that in our study. [12] A recent randomized-controlled trial assessed the benefit of home-based intervention program in addition to the center-based intervention. [13] There was more improvement in cognitive development and behavior in the additional home intervention group versus the control group (P=0.007).

This study has some significant drawbacks-small number of patients, lack of controls, and wide variation in the duration of intervention. However, the beneficial results are promising and may help to design a standardized parent-based behavior program for autistic children in developing countries.


   Acknowledgments Top


The authors thank Ms. Renuka Saha, Assistant Professor, Division of Statistics, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, for help with the statistical analysis.

 
   References Top

1.Prior M. Intensive behavioral intervention in autism. J Paediatr Child Health 2004;40:506-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Krishnamurthy V. A clinical experience of autism in India. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2008;29:331-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2000.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Schopler E, Reichler RJ, Renner BR. The Childhood Autism Rating Scale. Los Angeles, USA: Western Psychological Services; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Krug DA, Arick J, Almond P. Behavior checklist for identifying severely handicapped individuals with high levels of autistic behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1980;21:221-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Mundkur N, Agarwal V, Puri M. Early developmental profile- A diagnostic manual. Bangalore: Society for Child Development; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Malin AJ. Indian Adaptation of Vineland Social Maturity Scale. Lucknow: Indian Psychological Corporation; 1971.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Bzoch KB, League R. Assessing language skills in infancy: A handbook for the multidimensional analysis of emergent language. Gainsville: The tree of life Press; 1971.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Goldstein H. Communication Intervention for children with autism: A review of treatment efficacy. J Autism Dev Disord 2002;32:373-96.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
10.Lovaas OI. Behavioural treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. J Consult Clin Psychol 1987;55:3-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
11.Aldred C, Green J, Adams C. A new social communication intervention for children with autism: A pilot randomized controlled treatment study suggesting effectiveness. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 2004;45:1420-30.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Drew A, Baird G, Baron-Cohen S, Cox A, Slonims V, Wheelwright S, et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial of a parent training intervention for preschool children with autism. Eur J Child Adolsc Psychiatr 2002;11:266-72.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
13.Rickards AL, Walstab JE, Wright-Rossi RA, Simpson J, Reddihough DS. A randomized, controlled trial of a home-based intervention program for children with autism and developmental delay. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2007;28:308-16.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 CDC Kerala 9: Effectiveness of Low Intensity Home Based Early Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder in India
M. K. C. Nair,Paul Swamidhas Sudhakar Russell,Babu George,G. L. Prasanna,Deepa Bhaskaran,M. L. Leena,Sushila Russell,Priya Mammen
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2014;
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (321 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1273    
    Printed89    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded83    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal