home : about us : ahead of print : current issue : archives search instructions : subscriptionLogin 
Users online: 567      Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this page Email this page


 
TECHNICAL NOTE
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 67-68
 

Modification of shunt introducer


Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Mayville, Durban, 4058, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Correspondence Address:
Aleksander M Vitali
Department of Neurosurgery, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 800 Bellair Avenue, P. Bag X03, Mayville, Durban, 4058, KwaZulu-Natal
South Africa
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.36765

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

The insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt is one of the most common pediatric neurosurgical procedures. A majority of these operations are efficient by junior doctors. Any modification to the technique that makes the procedure easier may decrease the number of complications. The authors describe a quick modification to the ventriculoperitoneal shunt introducer. This enables the easy and fast tunneling for catheter insertion, even in the patient with a massive head due to neglected hydrocephalus, thereby decreasing the operative time and possibly the risk of infection.


Keywords: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt, CSF shunt, hydrocephalus, surgical technique, technical note, macrocephaly


How to cite this article:
Vitali AM, le Roux AA. Modification of shunt introducer. J Pediatr Neurosci 2007;2:67-8

How to cite this URL:
Vitali AM, le Roux AA. Modification of shunt introducer. J Pediatr Neurosci [serial online] 2007 [cited 2020 Sep 23];2:67-8. Available from: http://www.pediatricneurosciences.com/text.asp?2007/2/2/67/36765



   Introduction Top


The insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt remains one of the commonest neurosurgical procedures. The majority of these operations are performed in pediatric patients. On the completion of the training, most neurosurgeons have their own technique of introducer modification and shunt insertion. These techniques will work well for the vast majority of hydrocephalic patients. However, in situations where the hydrocephalus has been neglected and there is an exceptional disproportion between the size of the head and the body, the usual technique of shunt placement may not be that effective. Such cases of neglected hydrocephalus are most common in less-developed countries, where prenatal screening is suboptimal, abortion is either not practiced (for religious or cultural reasons) or not available and resources for treatment and diagnosis may not be readily accessible. In the author's unit in Durban, South Africa, children with neglected hydrocephalus present usually with massively enlarged heads, thin necks, with very thin and fragile skin [Figure - 1]. Over the years, the authors have introduced a slight and quick modification to the commonly used shunt introducers (Codman, NMT, etc.), which has facilitated the passage of the peritoneal catheter subcutaneously between the scalp and the abdomen during VP shunt insertion.


   Technique Top


In a supine position, the head of the patient is turned to the opposite side and a rolled towel is placed under his/her neck. The incisions are marked and the skin in between the planned incisions is prepped and covered with a sterile drape. The abdominal cavity and cranium are opened in a routine way. The standard straight introducer [Figure - 2] is bent in the hands of the surgeon in an "S" shaped manner just prior to tunneling [Figure - 3]. The curvature is vaguely proportional to the size of the head. The tunneling is started at the cranial incision. Initially, the introducer tip follows the curvature of the skull. As soon as the introducer reaches the craniocervical junction, it is turned 180 with the tip facing upwards. The tunneling follows over the neck. After negotiating the clavicle and the upper chest, the introducer is being turned 180 again, making it easier to travel the remaining distance to the abdominal incision [Figure - 4]. The rest of the procedure is performed as discussed elsewhere.[1],[2]


   Discussion Top


Ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion is still one of the most common neurosurgical procedures. It has been documented that the duration of surgery and the surgical technique are related to the rate/risk of infection. [3],[4],[5] The tunneling for the insertion of the catheter can be one of the most difficult, time-consuming and traumatic parts of the operation. Patients with neglected hydrocephalus present with exceptionally large heads, thin necks, very thin skin (particulary over the neck), soft cranial bones and scaphoid abdomens. These factors make tunneling for the passage of the peritoneal catheter more treacherous and these children are prone to too deep or too superficial shunt placement under the skin and perforation of the skull, skin or lung. Proper positioning will decrease the difficulty and risks of the procedure; however, in young children with massive heads, it is often impossible to position them ideally with a straight line between cranial and abdominal incisions, as recommended in the booklets of the shunt companies'. [1]

To accommodate the different body contour of pediatric patients with large heads, we modified the shunt introducer. The bending of the shunt introducer can be done easily in the hands of the surgeon and it takes a few seconds. The tunneling with an "S"-shaped introducer with two 180 turns so that the curvature of the introducer matches the shape of the head and chest takes seconds . More importantly, the pulling and pressure damage of the surrounding tissue is kept to the minimum. This technique also eliminates the need for a third incision, which was often placed over the neck, where there is thin and poor quality skin and it is difficult to access for cleaning and operating, which increases the chance of wound infection. The abovementioned factors and the shorter operative time reduces the risk of shunt infection.

We recognize that this is only one of many variations of shunt placement. Most decisions regarding the direction of tunneling can be made on the basis of the individual characteristics of the patient. However, it should be noted that the described introducer modification can be employed also in abdomen-to-head tunneling.

This technique was employed by the authors in over 200 pediatric VP shunt insertions over the last 8 years. There were no complications related to the modification of the instrument or the direction of the tunneling. The average time of shunt insertion was between 20 and 30 min. In our opinion, this quick and easy modification to the insertion of the VP shunt is beneficial and can be used by any neurosurgeon.


   Acknowledgement Top


The authors are extremely grateful to Mrs. S. Govender from the Department of Neurosurgery, Durban, South Africa for providing secretarial assistance and to Dr. Paul Steinbok, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada for guidance, help and review of the manuscript. The authors of this manuscript do not have financial association with any of the mentioned products.

 
   References Top

1.Codman. Leaflet to UNI-SHUNT with Reservoir Kit, Codman and Shurtleff, Inc: 2003.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Greenberg MS. Handbook of Neurosurgery Greenberg Graphics, Inc: Lakeland, Florida; 1997. p. 408.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Choux M, Genitori L, Lang D, Lena G. Shunt implantation: reducing the incidence of shunt infection. J Neurosurg 1992;77:875-80.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.George R, Leibrock I, Epstein M. Long-term analysis of cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections. J Neurosurg 1979;51:804-11.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Kang JK, Lee IW. Long-term follow-up of shunting therapy. Childs Nerv Syst 1999;15:711-7.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (84 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Technique
    Discussion
    Acknowledgement
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5338    
    Printed176    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded342    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal